IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/globco/qt8r55t4fd.html

Labor Unions Are Not the “Bulwark of Democracy”

Author

Listed:
  • Ahlquist, John S
  • Ntounias, Theodoros

Abstract

In the face of contemporary democratic backsliding, are labor unions the “bulwark of democracy” that some have claimed? We decompose this into two analytically distinct phases: prevention and resistance. We argue that unions’ traditional structural, associational, and social power has declined to the point where their preventive influence is quite weak. As structural and associational power has declined, institutional power is vulnerable, even where union membership remains high. Empirically, we show that union density and coverage are uncorrelated with antidemocratic party vote shares across the OECD. In looking at resistance, we examine 11 episodes of twenty-first century democratic backsliding. In none of those cases were existing labor unions key players in resisting democratic erosion. In some instances, major unions were willing to capitulate to or even collaborate with increasingly undemocratic governments. Unions are not currently a reliable bulwark against backsliding, although they can and should be important parts of broader pro-democracy coalitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahlquist, John S & Ntounias, Theodoros, 2026. "Labor Unions Are Not the “Bulwark of Democracy”," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt8r55t4fd, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:globco:qt8r55t4fd
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8r55t4fd.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:globco:qt8r55t4fd. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/igcc/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.