IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/econwp/qt66n4x6g4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Admissions Bias: A New Approach to Validity Estimation in Selected Samples

Author

Listed:
  • Rothstein, Jesse M

Abstract

Validity researchers typically work with nonrandom samples, membership in which depends in part on the exam score being investigated. In a study of the SAT's validity for freshman GPA at a particular college, for example, FGPA is not observed for the entire pool of potential applicants, but only for those who are admitted and enroll. This sample selection biases validity estimates. Corrections for restriction of range remedy the problem only when the exam score is the sole determinant of selection, and even then do not permit consistent estimation of the exam's incremental validity. Regression omitted variables results motivate a proposed validity estimator that is consistent whenever the determinants of selection are observed. An algorithm is suggested for calculation of these "robust" validity coefficients, and used to estimate the SAT's validity at the University of California. The usual validity estimates are shown to be substantially biased, in the hypothesized directions, by admissions-induced sample selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Rothstein, Jesse M, 2002. "Admissions Bias: A New Approach to Validity Estimation in Selected Samples," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt66n4x6g4, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt66n4x6g4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/66n4x6g4.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt66n4x6g4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibbrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.