IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/econwp/qt5kx5755f.html

The United States, the ITO, and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Eichengreen, Barry
  • Odell, John

Abstract

A central issue facing the newly-created World Trade Organization is "the U.S. question." That is, to what extent will the United States abide by the spirit as well as the letter of the WTO's rules rather than going its own way de facto if not de jure? And what will shape the extent of U.S. compliance? In this paper we attempt to identify the distinctive features of the historical context that will shape the outcome. We do so by comparing the debate over the WTO with that surrounding the International Trade Organization. In analyzing the two episodes, we distinguish three stages in the process of reaching an international agreement: negotiation, ratification, and compliance. Our analysis of U.S. behavior in these stages emphasizes three factors: exit options (the value of the best alternative to ratifying an agreement), the slack between U.S. principals and their negotiating agents, and the presidential effort spent to build domestic support.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Eichengreen, Barry & Odell, John, 1996. "The United States, the ITO, and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5kx5755f, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt5kx5755f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5kx5755f.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey J. Schott, 1994. "Uruguay Round: An Assessment," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Mutti & R. Sampson & B. Yeung, 2000. "The effects of the Uruguay round: empirical evidence from U.S. industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(1), pages 59-69, January.
    2. Michael D. Bordo & Barry Eichengreen & Douglas A. Irwin, 1999. "Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hunderd Years Ago?," NBER Working Papers 7195, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. J. David Richardson, 2000. "The WTO and market-supportive regulation: a way forward on new competition, technological and labor issues," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 115-130.
    4. William R. Cline, 1995. "Evaluating the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Ian Wooton & Maurizio Zanardi, 2002. "Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-trust," Working Papers 2002_6, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow, revised Oct 2002.
    6. Smith, Vincent H., 1997. "Nafta, Gatt, And Agriculture In The Northern Rockies And Great Plains," Special Reports 29175, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    7. Lovely, Mary E., 1997. "Playing by the new subsidy rules: capital subsidies as substitutes for sectoral subsidies," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3-4), pages 463-482, November.
    8. Guash, J. Luis & Rajapatirana, Sarath, 1998. "Total strangers or soul mates? - antidumping and competition policies in Latin America and the Caribbean," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1958, The World Bank.
    9. David Collie, 2000. "A Rationale for the WTO Prohibition of Export Subsidies: Strategic Export Subsidies and World Welfare," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 229-245, July.
    10. Kala Krishna & Marie Thursby, 1997. "Whither Flat Panel Displays?," NBER Chapters, in: The Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies, pages 247-271, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Lovely, Mary E., 1995. "Economic Development in a Global Context: Implications of the Uruguay Round for Federal Tax Policy," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 48(3), pages 397-407, September.
    12. Robert W. McGee & Yeomin Yoon, 1998. "Korea and the World Trade Organization: Problems and Prospects," International Trade 9805006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Patrick Messerlin, 2015. "How open are public procurement markets?," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/89, European University Institute.
    14. Peter G. Warr & Helal Ahammad, 1997. "Food aid, food policy and the Uruguay round: implications for Bangladesh," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 169-185, January.
    15. Adrian Kay & Robert Ackrill, 2008. "Institutional change in the international governance of agriculture: a revised account," NBS Discussion Papers in Economics 2008/4, Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University.
    16. Peng Xu, 1997. "Effect Of Multi‐Fiber Arrangement Trade Restrictions On Textile Industry Profit Margins," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(3), pages 93-102, July.
    17. Bender, Siegfried & Li, Kui-Wai, 2002. "The Changing Trade and Revealed Comparative Advantages of Asian and Latin American Manufacture Exports," Center Discussion Papers 28478, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
    18. -, 1998. "Directions for the reform process in the Caribbean," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 27437, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. Meilke, Karl D. & Sarker, Rakhal, 1995. "National Administered Protection Agencies: Their Role in the Post-Uruguay Round World," 1995: Understanding Technical Barriers to Agricultural Trade Conference, December 1995, Tucson, Arizona 50714, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann, 2015. "Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15889, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt5kx5755f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibbrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.