IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/econwp/qt5kx5755f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The United States, the ITO, and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Eichengreen, Barry
  • Odell, John

Abstract

A central issue facing the newly-created World Trade Organization is "the U.S. question." That is, to what extent will the United States abide by the spirit as well as the letter of the WTO's rules rather than going its own way de facto if not de jure? And what will shape the extent of U.S. compliance? In this paper we attempt to identify the distinctive features of the historical context that will shape the outcome. We do so by comparing the debate over the WTO with that surrounding the International Trade Organization. In analyzing the two episodes, we distinguish three stages in the process of reaching an international agreement: negotiation, ratification, and compliance. Our analysis of U.S. behavior in these stages emphasizes three factors: exit options (the value of the best alternative to ratifying an agreement), the slack between U.S. principals and their negotiating agents, and the presidential effort spent to build domestic support.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Eichengreen, Barry & Odell, John, 1996. "The United States, the ITO, and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5kx5755f, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt5kx5755f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/5kx5755f.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt5kx5755f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibbrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.