De-normalizing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: effects of tax measures on social norms and attitudes in the California Bay Area

BackgroundSocial norms can influence individual health behaviors. Shifts in social norms for smoking were critical for the effectiveness of tobacco control efforts such as excise taxes. Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes have been implemented in municipalities across the United States to reduce SSB intake and improve health. We sought to identify trends in social norms and attitudes about healthfulness of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption in the California Bay Area and examine whether social norms and attitudes changed following SSB taxes.MethodsData came from annual (2016–2019, 2021) cross-sectional surveys (n = 9128) in lower-income neighborhoods in Oakland, San Francisco, Berkeley, and Richmond. We assessed overall trends and compared pre-post tax changes in Oakland and San Francisco with comparison cities.ResultsWe observed a 28% reduction in social norms for SSB consumption (people’s perceptions of peers’ consumption) and variable reductions in attitudes about the healthfulness of SSBs. Relative to comparison cities, post-tax, perceptions of peers’ consumption of sports drinks declined in Oakland; attitudes about the healthfulness of sugar-sweetened fruit drinks declined in San Francisco.ConclusionsAmong lower-income populations, social norms and attitudes towards the healthfulness of SSBs meaningfully declined over time, with smaller tax-related effects. SSB taxes as well as the local media attention they generate appear to affect people’s perceptions of SSBs. Pairing SSB taxes with messaging campaigns may be more effective in de-normalizing SSB consumption.