IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cba/wpaper/wp114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reviewing Australia's Static Tax/Transfer Microsimulation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Phillips

    (NATSEM, University of Canberra)

  • Robert Tanton

    (NATSEM, University of Canberra)

Abstract

In 2010, the Secretary to the Treasury of the Government of Australia (Ken Henry) chaired a review of Australia’s Tax system (called the Henry Review). This review outlined a number of significant changes to Australia’s tax system, which could be implemented over a number of years, including reducing the corporate tax rate; and the introduction of a new mining tax. This review provides a long term strategy for Australia’s tax system, but also shows that Australia’s current static Tax/Transfer model (STINMOD) will need to be re-configured to be able to respond to future demands for policy modelling. As a start to this, NATSEM and the Commonwealth Government have instituted a full review of the STINMOD model, from a full code review through to fundamental questions about how the model will be able to respond to future policy requirements. This paper will highlight how the model was reviewed, what was considered in the review, and what the conclusions of the review were.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Phillips & Robert Tanton, 2011. "Reviewing Australia's Static Tax/Transfer Microsimulation Model," NATSEM Working Paper Series 11/04, University of Canberra, National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling.
  • Handle: RePEc:cba:wpaper:wp114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.natsem.canberra.edu.au/files/download?id=697
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Australian Tax System; STINMOD;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cba:wpaper:wp114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Trueman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/natseau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.