IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camafp/98-af41.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Empirical Tests for Differences in Equilibrium Risk Measures with Application to Downside Risk in Small and Large UK Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Pedersen, C. S.

Abstract

Several authors have proposed CAPM-style linear pricing models which utilise alternative notions of risk than the variance. The question then arises of whether these models produce equilibrium measures of risk, i.e. Betas, which are statistically different from that off the mean-variance CAPM. This paper surveys the models testing for such differences, a procedure involving making a distributional assumption for the excess return on the market portfolio which allows re-estimation of the model so that the maintained hypothesis is tested. This augmented procedure is then applied to a range of different datasets, including both emerging markets and small and large UK companies. The emerging markets data are found to be unsuitable for testing as the CAPM-style models are inapprop- riate for modelling extreme events while, for the UK data, smaller companies are more likely than larger ones to reject the mean-variance CAPM in favour of either the mean-semivariance CAPM or an unspecified alternative.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedersen, C. S., 1998. "Empirical Tests for Differences in Equilibrium Risk Measures with Application to Downside Risk in Small and Large UK Companies," Accounting and Finance Discussion Papers 98-af41, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    • Handle: RePEc:cam:camafp:98-af41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Pedersen & Stephen Satchell, 2002. "On the foundation of performance measures under asymmetric returns," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 217-223.
    2. Pavabutr, Pantisa, 2003. "An evaluation of MLPM allocation rules on emerging markets portfolios," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 73-90, March.
    3. Herv¨¦ Ndoume Essingone & Mouhamadou Saliou Diallo, 2019. "Risk and Return: The Case of Securities Listed on the West African Economic and Monetary Union Regional Exchange of Securities (BRVM)," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 97-108, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camafp:98-af41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.