IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bwp/bwppap/0907.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Relational Approach to the Theory and Practices of Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Woolcock
  • Elizabeth Radin

Abstract

Arguments and evidence from the social sciences, natural sciences and development practice are used to frame a broader discussion of the role of social relations in the process of economic development. We trace the intellectual history of social relations within theories of economic development and situate the rise of ‘social capital’ as idea and practice in the late twentieth century. Brief surveys of empirical and applied research in development studies—as well as recent influential work on preference formation, expectations and social identity in the fields of experimental economics, psychology and biology—are used to argue that there is now a diverse storehouse of compelling theory and evidence in support of propositions and hypotheses that have long been at the heart of social capital scholarship. Much remains to be done, however, on multiple fronts. The paper concludes with practical examples of social capital ideas in action in development projects around the world, from which scholars have much to learn. More frequent dialogue across the disciplines, and between scholars and practitioners, is needed to consolidate and advance our knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Woolcock & Elizabeth Radin, 2007. "A Relational Approach to the Theory and Practices of Economic Development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 0907, GDI, The University of Manchester.
  • Handle: RePEc:bwp:bwppap:0907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/gdi/publications/workingpapers/bwpi/bwpi-wp-0907.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garofalo, Maria Rosaria, 2011. "Il volontariato può sostenere lo sviluppo? Riflessioni metodologiche per la costruzione di un frame work teorico
      [Can the voluntary sector sustain the development path of an economy? Suggestions fo
      ," MPRA Paper 40008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Stephen Knowles & P. Dorian Owen, 2010. "Which Institutions are Good for Your Health? The Deep Determinants of Comparative Cross-country Health Status," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 701-723.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bwp:bwppap:0907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rowena Harding). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/wpmanuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.