IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Reverberation of Legal Principles: Further Thoughts on the Development of an EU Principle of Prohibition of Abuse of Law

Listed author(s):
  • Rita de la Feria


    (Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation)

Registered author(s):

    On February 2006 the Court of Justice delivered its eagerly awaited ruling in Halifax, a case concerning the interpretation of EU secondary legislation on VAT. The judgment represented the culmination of a long process, with the Court referring for the first time to the 'principle of prohibiting abusive practices'. Yet, Halifax also represented the beginning of a new process: the discussion over the significance of the newly designated 'principle of prohibition of abuse of law'. Fundamental questions immediately arose and were the subject of intensive debate such as: the scope of application of the principle - would it apply to other areas of tax law, in particular to corporate taxation; the criteria for application of the principle – how would the abuse test set out by the Court in Halifax be applied; and, the nature and implications of this 'principle' - interpretative, general, or neither. This brief paper considers the ongoing debate over the development of an EU principle of prohibition of abuse of law, offering some further thoughts on the topic. In particular, the paper reflects first on the role of the principle within the field of free movement of persons, in the context of the literature on convergences and divergences between the fundamental freedoms. It then progresses to propose the notion of reverberation as a new conceptual framework for the analysis of the development of general principles of EU law - in this case based upon the ongoing example of prohibition of abuse of law. The paper concludes with some thoughts on the future of the principle of prohibition of abuse of law and its potential consequences.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation in its series Working Papers with number 1021.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2010
    Handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:1021
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1HP UK

    Phone: +44 (0)1865 288800
    Fax: +44 (0)1865 288805
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:btx:wpaper:1021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dongxian Guo)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.