IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Major Field Test in Business: A Pretend Solution to the Real Problem of Assurance of Learning Assessment

Listed author(s):
  • Jeffrey J. Green


    (Department of Economics, Ball State University)

  • Courtenay C. Stone


    (Department of Economics, Ball State University)

  • Abera Zegeye


    (Department of Economics, Ball State University)

  • Thomas A. Charles


    (Department of Economics, Ball State University)

Registered author(s):

    Colleges and universities are being asked by numerous sources to provide Assurance of Learning assessments of their students and programs. Colleges of Business have responded by using a plethora of assessment tools, including the Major Field Test in Business. In this article, we show that the use of the Major Field Test in Business for Assurance of Learning purposes is ill-advised. First, it provides no direct evidence of student learning. Second, it offers no useful comparative analyses to other business students or institutions. Consequently, it provides no guidance for curriculum or program changes to achieve better learning outcomes. Thus, use of the Major Field Test in Business offers only a ‘pretend’ solution to the problem of Assurance of Learning assessment.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Ball State University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 201201.

    in new window

    Length: 16 pages
    Date of creation: Jul 2012
    Date of revision: Jul 2012
    Handle: RePEc:bsu:wpaper:201201
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Muncie, Indiana 47306

    Phone: (765) 285-5360
    Fax: (765) 285-8024
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsu:wpaper:201201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tung Liu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.