IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bsl/wpaper/2025-07.html

Start-to-Low Drawdown as a Risk Measure and its Application to Portfolio Optimization for Levered Investors under Solvency Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Maringer, Dietmar
  • Stähli, Philipp

Abstract

Drawdown is an important risk measure in both theory and practice. Most drawdown measures use the running peak as the reference point from which to calculate the drawdown. Instead, the start-to-low drawdown (SLD), which references the start of the period, is firstly proposed as a relevant measure for levered investors. Secondly, an application to a levered investor who is also subject to regulatory capital requirements, as seen in the banking or insurance industry, is proposed. Such an investor is faced with regulatory sanctions as soon as their own funds no longer cover capital requirements, i.e., even before equity is exhausted. Portfolio optimization objectives are developed that consider return, cost of capital, and cost of drawdown together: the solvency cost-adjusted return (SCAR) including the cost of drawdown (SCARD). This is applied to the European insurance industry, with capital requirement calculations following the Solvency II standard model. For the empirical analysis, models of life and non-life insurance companies are constructed using EIOPA market overview data, and their investments are optimized for SCAR and SCARD as objectives. The investment universe consists of equity, corporate bond, and government bond indices with data ranging from 2005 to 2024. The characteristics and performance of SCARD-optimal portfolios of the modeled companies are compared to those of SCAR-optimal and equally weighted portfolios. Out-of-sample SCAR and SCARD following both objectives are higher than those of the equally weighted reference portfolio. SCARD-optimal portfolios show lower cost of solvency capital and lower drawdown than their SCAR-optimal counterparts, but also lower returns. The differences in return outweigh those of the other components, resulting in the SCAR and SCARD of SCAR-optimal portfolios tending to be higher than those of SCARD-optimal portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Maringer, Dietmar & Stähli, Philipp, 2025. "Start-to-Low Drawdown as a Risk Measure and its Application to Portfolio Optimization for Levered Investors under Solvency Regimes," Working papers 2025/07, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    • Handle: RePEc:bsl:wpaper:2025/07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://edoc.unibas.ch/bitstreams/361f9b0c-3857-4a8b-95bd-387ba85eb868/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexei Chekhlov & Stanislav Uryasev & Michael Zabarankin, 2005. "Drawdown Measure In Portfolio Optimization," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 13-58.
    2. Victor DeMiguel & Lorenzo Garlappi & Francisco J. Nogales & Raman Uppal, 2009. "A Generalized Approach to Portfolio Optimization: Improving Performance by Constraining Portfolio Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 798-812, May.
    3. Roy Kouwenberg, 2018. "Strategic asset allocation for insurers under Solvency II," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(7), pages 447-459, December.
    4. Mikica Drenovak & Vladimir Ranković & Branko Urošević & Ranko Jelic, 2021. "Bond portfolio management under Solvency II regulation," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 857-879, June.
    5. Ning Zhang & Jingnan Chen & Gengling Dai, 2022. "Portfolio Selection with Regularization," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 39(02), pages 1-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salo, Ahti & Doumpos, Michalis & Liesiö, Juuso & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2024. "Fifty years of portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Chung-Han Hsieh, 2022. "On Solving Robust Log-Optimal Portfolio: A Supporting Hyperplane Approximation Approach," Papers 2202.03858, arXiv.org.
    3. Weilong Liu & Yanchu Liu, 2025. "Covariance Matrix Estimation for Positively Correlated Assets," Papers 2507.01545, arXiv.org.
    4. Weidong Lin & Jose Olmo & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2025. "Portfolio Selection under Systemic Risk," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 57(4), pages 905-949, June.
    5. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    6. Neofytos Rodosthenous & Hongzhong Zhang, 2020. "When to sell an asset amid anxiety about drawdowns," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1422-1460, October.
    7. Mishra, Anil V., 2016. "Foreign bias in Australian-domiciled mutual fund holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-123.
    8. Hongzhong Zhang, 2018. "Stochastic Drawdowns," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 10078.
    9. Nathan Lassance & Victor DeMiguel & Frédéric Vrins, 2022. "Optimal Portfolio Diversification via Independent Component Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 55-72, January.
    10. Liusha Yang & Romain Couillet & Matthew R. McKay, 2015. "A Robust Statistics Approach to Minimum Variance Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1503.08013, arXiv.org.
    11. Vaughn Gambeta & Roy Kwon, 2020. "Risk Return Trade-Off in Relaxed Risk Parity Portfolio Optimization," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Fan, Jianqing & Liao, Yuan & Shi, Xiaofeng, 2015. "Risks of large portfolios," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 367-387.
    13. Seyoung Park & Eun Ryung Lee & Sungchul Lee & Geonwoo Kim, 2019. "Dantzig Type Optimization Method with Applications to Portfolio Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.
    14. McDowell, Shaun, 2018. "An empirical evaluation of estimation error reduction strategies applied to international diversification," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Lan, Hairong & Wang, Liukai & Li, Mengting & Xiong, Yu & Li, Yuqing, 2025. "Network centrality, diversification, and portfolio returns: Economic insights from blockchain industry," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Jacobs, Heiko & Müller, Sebastian & Weber, Martin, 2014. "How should individual investors diversify? An empirical evaluation of alternative asset allocation policies," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 62-85.
    17. Bagnara, Matteo & Vaucher, Benoit, 2025. "Risk diversification and extreme risk mitigation," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2022. "Markowitz portfolios under transaction costs," ECON - Working Papers 420, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Sep 2024.
    19. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M., 2006. "Portfolio selection with a drawdown constraint," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 3171-3189, November.
    20. Constantinos Kardaras & Jan Obłój & Eckhard Platen, 2017. "The Numéraire Property And Long-Term Growth Optimality For Drawdown-Constrained Investments," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 68-95, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsl:wpaper:2025/07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: WWZ (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wwzbsch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.