IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bre/polcon/856.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The twenty-first century needs a better G20 and a new G7+

Author

Listed:
  • Jim O‘Neill
  • Alessio Terzi

Abstract

Read also Jim O'Neill and Alessio Terzi's survey of the G20 sherpas 'The world is ready for a global economic governance reform, are world leaders?' During the 2008 financial crisis, the G20 was hastily elevated to ‘global economic steering committee’. In the early stages of the crisis, the G20 was an effective forum for crisis containment. As the crisis has eased, however, the G20 has lost both direction and momentum....

Suggested Citation

  • Jim O‘Neill & Alessio Terzi, 2014. "The twenty-first century needs a better G20 and a new G7+," Policy Contributions 856, Bruegel.
  • Handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/THE_TWENTY-FIRST_CENTURY_NEEDS_A_BETTER_G20_AND_A_NEW_G7___English_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Suman Bery & Filippo Biondi & Sybrand Brekelmans, 2019. "Twenty years of the G20: Has it changed global economic governance?," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 5(4), pages 412-440, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruegel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bruegbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.