IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bre/polcon/781.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bank versus non-bank credit in the United States, Europe and China

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Véron

Abstract

However, the debate about financial system structures remains immature, in large part due to lack of reliable and comparable data. The available evidence actually points towards a correlation between the development of non-bank credit and higher resilience against systemic risk, at least in developed economies. Policy should aim at better statistical information, and at strengthening the infrastructure for the gradual development of sustainable nonbank credit provision. A version of this...

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Véron, 2013. "Bank versus non-bank credit in the United States, Europe and China," Policy Contributions 781, Bruegel.
  • Handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/imported/publications/pc_2013_07_credit_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladimir N. Alekseev & Nikolay N. Sharkov, 2019. "Approaches to Development of Financial Infrastructure Informational-Regulative System," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 2, pages 109-121, April.
    2. P. Lakshmi & M. Thenmozhi & Nikhil Varaiya, 2019. "Determinants of Aggregate Credit Flows to U.S. Corporate and Noncorporate Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440188, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruegel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bruegbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.