Bank versus non-bank credit in the United States, Europe and China
However, the debate about financial system structures remains immature, in large part due to lack of reliable and comparable data. The available evidence actually points towards a correlation between the development of non-bank credit and higher resilience against systemic risk, at least in developed economies. Policy should aim at better statistical information, and at strengthening the infrastructure for the gradual development of sustainable nonbank credit provision. A version of this Policy Contribution was prepared for discussion at the China-US Economists Symposium The path to recovery, co-organised by the China Finance 40 Forum and the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Beijing, 12-13 April, 2013, and published in the volume of conference proceedings.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2013|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Rue de la Charité, B-1210 Brussels|
Phone: +32 2 227 4210
Web page: http://www.bruegel.org
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bre:polcon:781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bruegel)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.