IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bos/wpaper/wp2019-005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Rationally Inattentive Discrete Choice: A Posterior-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jianjun Miao

    (Boston University)

  • Hao Xing

    (Boston University)

Abstract

We adopt the posterior-based approach to study dynamic discrete choice problems with rational inattention. We show that the optimal solution for the Shannon entropy case is characterized by a system of equations that resembles the dynamic logit rule. We propose an efficient algorithm to solve this system and apply our model to explain phenomena such as status quo bias, confirmation bias, and belief polarization. We also study the dynamics of consideration sets. Unlike the choice-based approach, our approach applies to general uniformly posteriorseparable information cost functions. A key condition for our approach to work in dynamic models is the convexity of the difference between the discounted generalized entropy of the prior beliefs about the future states and the generalized entropy of the current posterior.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianjun Miao & Hao Xing, 2019. "Dynamic Rationally Inattentive Discrete Choice: A Posterior-Based Approach," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2019-05, Boston University - Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2019-005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://people.bu.edu/miaoj/Discrete15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rational Inattention; Endogenous Information Acquisition; Entropy; Dynamic Discrete Choice; Dynamic Programming;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2019-005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Program Coordinator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decbuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.