IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug11/04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implementing the continual reassessment method (CRM)

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Mander

    (MRC Biostatistics Unit Hub for Trials Methodology, Cambridge)

Abstract

One of the aims of a phase I trial in oncology is to find the maximum tolerated dose. A set of doses is administered to participants starting from the lowest dose in increasing steps. To do this safely, the toxicity of each dose is assessed, and a decision is made about whether to proceed with the next highest dose until the desired target toxicity level is found. A suitable dose is then chosen to take forward into phase II studies to discover whether this drug is efficacious. The majority of oncology phase I trials use algorithm-based rules such as the 3 + 3 design to escalate doses; the 3 + 3 design is easy to implement by nonstatisticians but is statistically inefficient. Other designs, such as the continual reassessment method (O'Quigley, Pepe, and Fisher 1990), use a model to help guide the decision of which dose to give. The complexity of the CRM and that it requires software may be reasons why it is not more widely used. This talk will describe a new command crm that is a Mata implementation of the CRM and includes some discussion about the programming difficulties.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Mander, 2011. "Implementing the continual reassessment method (CRM)," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2011 04, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug11:04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2011/UK11_Mander.pdf
    File Function: presentation slides
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Newson, 2001. "B-splines and splines parameterized by their values at reference points on the x-axis," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(57).
    2. Roger Newson, 2001. "Splines with parameters that can be explained in words to non-mathematicians," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2001 11, Stata Users Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug11:04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.