IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug09/10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Funnel plots for institutional comparisons

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Gini

    () (Regional Agency for Public Health of Tuscany)

  • Sylvia Forni

    () (Regional Agency for Public Health of Tuscany)

Abstract

We introduce -funnelcompar-, a Stata routine that performs the analysis suggested by David J. Spiegelhalter (Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance, Statistics in Medicine, Volume 24 Issue 8, 1185-1202). The basic idea in funnel plot is to plot performance indicators against a measure of their precision in order to detect outliers. A scatter plot of an indicator level is plotted together with a baseline and control limits, that shrinks as the sample size gets bigger. Our command performs funnel plots for binomial (proportion) poisson (crude and standardized rates) and normal (means) distributed variables. The baseline (and stan- dard errors in case of normal variables) can either be specified by the user (for instance as literature reference) or be estimated from the data as a weighted or non-weighted mean of the data. By default confidence limits are plotted at 2 and 3 standard error, in order to detect alarm and alert signals, as recommended by statistical process control theory. Options have been implemented to mark single institutions, groups of institutions or those institutions lying outside control limits. These plots are increasingly used to report performance indicators at institutional level. Classical league tables imply the existence of ranking between institutions and implicitly support the idea that some of them are worse/better than others. A different approach is possible using statistical process control theory: all institutions are part of a single system and perform at the same level. Observed differences can never be completely eliminated and are explained by chance (common cause variation). If ob- served variation exceed that expected, special-cause variation exists and requires further explanation to identify its cause.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Gini & Sylvia Forni, 2009. "Funnel plots for institutional comparisons," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2009 10, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug09:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/usug2009/Gini-Forni.pdf
    File Function: presentation slides
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug09:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.