IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Three models for combining information from causal indicators

Listed author(s):
  • Maarten Buis


    (University of Tuebingen)

Sometimes we have multiple measures of the same concept. Combining the information of these multiple measures would allow us to improve the measurement. When combining the information from different indicators one needs to distinguish between two types of relationships between the observed indicators and the underlying latent variable: either the latent variable influences the indicators or the indicators influence the latent variable. To distinguish between these two situations some authors, following Bollen (Quality and Quantity, 1984) and Bollen and Lennox (Psychological Bulletin, 1991), call the observed variables "effect indicators" when they are influenced by the latent variable, while they call the observed variables "causal indicators" when they influence the latent variable. Distinguishing between these two is important as they require very different strategies for recovering the latent variable. In a basic (exploratory) factor analysis, which is a model for effect indicators, one assumes that the only thing that the observed variables have in common is the latent variable, so any correlation between the observed variables must be due to the latent variable, and it is this correlation that is used to recover the latent variable. In the models for causal indicators that will discussed in this talk, we assume that the latent variable is a weighted sum of the observed variables (and optionally an error term), and the weights are estimated such that they are optimal for predicting the dependent variable. The three models for dealing with causal indicators that will be discussed are: A model with "sheaf coefficients" (Heise, Sociological Methods & Research, 1972), a model with "parametricaly weighted covariates" (Yamaguchi, Sociological Methodology, 2002), and a Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model (Hauser Goldberger, Sociological Methodoloy, 1971). The latter two can be estimated using -propcnsreg-, while the former can be estimated using -sheafcoef-. Both are available from SSC.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: presentation slides
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Stata Users Group in its series United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2009 with number 03.

in new window

Date of creation: 16 Sep 2009
Handle: RePEc:boc:usug09:03
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug09:03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.