IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/usug04/5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A new Stata command for estimating confidence intervals for the variance component of random-effects linear models

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Bottai

    (Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
    Institute of Information Science and Technology, National Research Council, Pisa)

  • Nicola Orsini

    (Institute of Information Science and Technology, National Research Council, Pisa
    Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm)

Abstract

The Stata command xtreg estimates the random-effects linear regression model, for which the random effects are assumed to be normally distributed with zero mean and non-negative variance, s^2_{i,t}. Testing homogeneity across units is equivalent to testing the null hypothesis H_0: s^2_{i,t} = 0, which is a value on the boundary of the parameter space. The command xtreg provides the upper-tail probability of the appropriate asymptotic distribution of the likelihood ratio test statistic. However, such a method cannot be used to construct confidence intervals for the parameter s^2_{i,t}. Besides, confidence intervals for the random-effect variance that are based on a Wald-type test, too often used, can be shown to be asymptotically wrong. Based on the asymptotic theory for singular information problems, a method is developed and implemented in the Stata command xtci, which provides asymptotically-correct confidence intervals. Also, when testing the hypothesis of homogeneity across units, the proposed method is shown to have better small-sample properties than one based on the likelihood ratio test statistic.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Bottai & Nicola Orsini, 2004. "A new Stata command for estimating confidence intervals for the variance component of random-effects linear models," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2004 5, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug04:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug04:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.