IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/scon19/12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

ietoolkit: How DIME Analytics develops Stata code from primary data work

Author

Listed:
  • Kristoffer Bjarkefur

    (The World Bank Group)

  • Luiza Cardoso de Andrade

    (The World Bank Group)

  • Benjamin Daniels

    (The World Bank Group)

  • Mrijan Rimal

    (The World Bank Group)

Abstract

Over the years, the complexity of data work in development research has grown exponentially, and standardizations for workflows are needed for researchers and data analysts to work simultaneously on multiple projects. -ietoolkit- was developed to standardize and simplify best practices for data management and analysis across the 100+ members of the World Bank's Development Research Group, Impact Evaluations team (DIME). It includes a standardized project folder structure; standardized Stata 'boilerplate' code; standardized balance tables, graphs, and matching procedures; and modified dropping and saving commands with built-in safety checks. The presentation will outline how the -ietoolkit- structure is meant to serve as a guide for projects to move their data through the analysis process in a standardized way, as well as offer a brief introduction to the other commands. The intent is for many projects within one organization to have a predictable workflow, such that researchers and data analysts can move between multiple projects and support other teams easily and rapidly without expending time relearning idiosyncratic project organization structures and standards. These tools are developed open-source on GitHub and available publicly.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristoffer Bjarkefur & Luiza Cardoso de Andrade & Benjamin Daniels & Mrijan Rimal, 2019. "ietoolkit: How DIME Analytics develops Stata code from primary data work," 2019 Stata Conference 12, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:scon19:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/scon2019/chicago19_Bjarkefur.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:scon19:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.