IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Logistic Regression in Cases of Separation by Means of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Listed author(s):
  • Joseph Coveney


    (Cobridge Co., Ltd.)

Registered author(s):

    Users of –logit- or –logistic- occasionally encounter instances in which one or more predictors perfectly predict one or both outcomes (a condition called separation), or in which some outcomes are completely determined (quasicomplete separation). Finite maximum likelihood estimates do not exist under conditions of separation. Exact logistic regression with –exlogistic- can serve as an alternative in these circumstances, but is sometimes not feasible. In the 1990s, David Firth proposed a type of penalization for reducing bias of maximum likelihood estimates in generalized linear models by means of modifying the score equations. Firth’s method has the interpretation of penalized maximum likelihood when the canonical link function is used, such as in logistic regression. In this decade, Georg Heinze and colleagues have explored this technique as a solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. A Stata implementation, -firthlogit-, which maximizes the log penalized likelihood using –ml-, is described here. Model fitting and predictions, inference with penalized likelihood ratio tests, and construction of profile penalized likelihood confidence intervals is illustrated using examples where –logit- and –logistic- either balk or do not give finite maximum likelihood estimates, and where exact logistic regression is problematic because of memory requirements or degenerate conditional distributions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: presentation slides
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Stata Users Group in its series Summer North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2008 with number 10.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 29 Jul 2008
    Date of revision: 24 Sep 2008
    Handle: RePEc:boc:nsug08:10
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:nsug08:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.