IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Probabilistic bias analysis of epidemiological results

Listed author(s):
  • Nicola Orsini


    (Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet)

Classification errors, selection bias, and uncontrolled confounding are likely to be present in most epidemiological studies, but the uncertainty introduced by this type of biases is seldom quantified. The authors present a simple yet easy-to-use method to adjust the relative risk of a disease for misclassification of a binary exposure, selection bias, and unmeasured confounding variable. The accompanying Stata tool implements both ordinary and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. It allows the user to specify a variety of probability densities for the bias parameters, and use these densities to obtain simulation limits for the bias adjusted exposure-disease relative risk. The authors illustrate the method by applying it to a published positive association between occupational resin exposure and lung-cancer deaths in a case-control study. By employing plausible probability distributions for the bias parameters, investigators can report results that incorporate their uncertainties regarding unmeasured or uncontrolled confounding, and thus avoid overstating their certainty about the effect under study. These results can usefully supplement standard data descriptions and conventional results.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: presentation slides
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Stata Users Group in its series Nordic and Baltic Stata Users' Group Meetings 2007 with number 4.

in new window

Date of creation: 19 Sep 2007
Handle: RePEc:boc:nsug07:4
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:nsug07:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.