IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/msug10/01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimation of treatment effects for social program evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Stabridis

    (Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social)

  • Janet Zamudio

    (Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social)

  • Mario Paulín

    (Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social)

Abstract

Because impact evaluation is an important tool that guides public policy decisions and because applying impact evaluation is a rigorous process, we must generate examples of how impact evaluation methodologies apply to the Mexican context. To this end, we have used nonexperimental methodologies to estimate treatment effects for Mexican social programs. In order to quantify the effects that a social program has on its beneficiaries’ welfare and productive activities, we have used Stata to estimate treatment effects and to generate an adequate database with information from the Mexican Family Life Survey for the years 2002 and 2005. Two central Stata commands were used: pscore and psmatch2. The pscore command estimates the propensity score and stratifies individuals according to the propensity-score distribution, using for this a series of covariables that are assumed to be related to both treatment status and the result variable. This command also checks that the balancing property is satisfied. psmatch2 performs a variety of matching estimation methods to obtain estimates of the average treatment effect on the treated. Additionally, we used database handling commands such as foreach, merge, collapse, gen, egen, recode, and replace. Our panel will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these commands when applied to the evaluation of social programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Stabridis & Janet Zamudio & Mario Paulín, 2010. "Estimation of treatment effects for social program evaluation," Mexican Stata Users' Group Meetings 2010 01, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:msug10:01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:msug10:01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.