IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/lsug26/13.html

From sequential binary models to first-best multinomial choice: A Stata implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Ricardo Mora

    (Universidad Carlos III Madrid)

  • Yunrong Li

    (Universidad Carlos III Madrid)

Abstract

This presentation introduces a Stata implementation of a Gentzkow-style framework for studying complementarity between two binary decisions. Building on Gentzkow (2007) and Li and Mora (2022), the approach models the four possible bundles jointly and treats the multinomial choice as the first-best benchmark. Standard bivariate probit models, even with correlated errors, do not capture Hicksian complementarity. Sequential binary models can be informative because they estimate whether one choice affects the other; we establish the bridge between these sequential representations and the first-best multinomial model. This bridge identifies three types of decision-makers: those for whom no sequence is compatible with the first best, those for whom only one ordering is compatible, and those for whom both orderings are compatible. The accompanying Stata module, gentzkow, currently estimates the model using a mixed logit specification and reports complementarity patterns and type probabilities implied by the estimated utilities. We illustrate the usefulness of the approach with household-level data on three-generation families, focusing on whether families live together and whether they share childcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Mora & Yunrong Li, "undated". "From sequential binary models to first-best multinomial choice: A Stata implementation," UK Stata Conference 2026 13, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:lsug26:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:lsug26:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.