Author
Listed:
- Alan Montgomery
(University of Nottingham)
- Reuben Ogollah
(University of Nottingham)
- Christopher Partlett
(University of Nottingham)
- Cydney Bruce
(University of Nottingham)
Abstract
When designing and conducting a randomized controlled trial, there are a variety of randomization methods to choose from, but limited evidence on the performance of the methods under speciRc study designs. The rampe package contains 12 metrics designed to measure the balance and predictability of randomization sequences in Stata. This will allow researchers to easily compare method performance using data that mirrors the speciRc trial that is being designed. Balance metrics: Measured both as the greatest imbalance observed throughout recruitment and as the Rnal imbalance once the target sample size is achieved. groupimbalance: Measures the imbalance between the expected and observed ratio of participants in each treatment group. charimbalance: Measures the greatest imbalance observed across a set of covariates and the average imbalance across covariates. Predictability metrics: Measured as the proportion of correct guesses for a variety of prediction strategies. This is calculated for the whole sequence and assuming that recruiting sites have information only about previous allocations at their own site. Alternation recruiter assumes the next allocation is the one least recently allocated. backtheloser: Recruiter assumes the next allocation is the one with the fewest previous allocations. predbalance: Recruiter assumes the next allocation is the group with the smallest marginal total across randomization covariates. In this talk, I will describe each of the developed metrics in more detail, discuss the interpretation of each metric, and demonstrate with an example how this package can be used in practice.
Suggested Citation
Alan Montgomery & Reuben Ogollah & Christopher Partlett & Cydney Bruce, 2025.
"Rampe: Randomization allocation method performance evaluation,"
UK Stata Conference 2025
09, Stata Users Group.
Handle:
RePEc:boc:lsug25:09
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:lsug25:09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.