IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Some challenges in survival analysis with large datasets

Listed author(s):
  • Noori Akhtar-Danesh


    (McMaster University)

Registered author(s):

    In this presentation some common challenges in survival analysis with large datasets are demonstrated. We investigate the relationship between the age of smoking initiation and some demographic factors in the Canadian Community Health Survey, Cycle 3.1 (CCHS-3.1) dataset. CCHS-3.1 is a large dataset which includes information for over 130000 individuals. We used different techniques for model fitting and model checking. Test-based techniques for the assessment of PH assumption are not very useful as small deviation from the theoretical model leads to the rejection of PH assumption. In contrast graphical approaches seem to be more helpful. However, not every diagnostic graph can be drawn due to large dataset. Preliminary results show that 63% of Canadians ever smoked a whole cigarette. Therefore, it seems more appropriate to use a cure fraction model (Lambert 2007; Stata Journal, 7:(3), pp. 1-25) to handle the large proportion of censored data. However, sampling weights cannot be used in this model. In conclusion, survival analysis for large datasets cannot be done easily. Some challenges include assessment of PH assumption and drawing diagnostic graphs. Besides, use of cure fraction model may not be appropriate if sampling weights cannot be incorporated in the model estimation.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Stata Users Group in its series Fall North American Stata Users' Group Meetings 2008 with number 4.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 16 Nov 2008
    Handle: RePEc:boc:fsug08:4
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:fsug08:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.