IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/dsug08/02.html

Direct and indirect effects in a logit model

Author

Listed:
  • Maarten L. Buis

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

In this presentation, I discuss a method by Erikson et al. (2005) for decomposing a total effect in a logit model into direct and indirect effects, and I propose a generalization of this method. Consider an example where social class has an indirect effect on attending college through academic performance in high school. The indirect effect is obtained by comparing the proportion of lower-class students that attend college with the counterfactual proportion of lower-class students if they had the distribution of performance of the higher-class students. This captures the association between class and attending college because of differences in performance, i.e., the indirect effect. The direct effect of class is obtained by comparing the proportion of higher-class students with the counterfactual proportion of lower-class students if they had the same distribution of performance as the higher-class students. This way, the variable performance is kept constant, and this results in the direct effect. If these comparisons are carried out in the form of log odds ratios, then the total effect will equal the sum of the direct and indirect effects. In its original form, this method assumes that the variable through which the indirect effect occurs is normally distributed. In this article, the method is generalized by allowing this variable to have any distribution, which has the added advantage of simplifying the method.

Suggested Citation

  • Maarten L. Buis, 2008. "Direct and indirect effects in a logit model," German Stata Users' Group Meetings 2008 02, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:dsug08:02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/dsug2008/Buis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:dsug08:02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.