IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/csug23/04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

bivpoisson_ate: A Stata command for average treatment effects estimation with correlated count-valued outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • James Fisher

    (Boston University)

  • Joseph Terza

    (IUPUI)

  • Abbie Zhang

    (Boston University)

Abstract

When we encounter correlated count-valued outcomes y1 in {0,1,...,M} and y2 in {0,1,...,M}, the identification and estimation of average treatment effects (ATEs) need to account for the correlation structure of the data-generating process. As illustrated by Fisher, Terza, and Zhang (2022), the Stata command bivpoisson estimates the deep parameters in count-valued seemingly unrelated regression (count SUR) models. Our model affords greater precision and accuracy in terms of deep parameter estimations in comparison with single-equation Poisson models (by Stata's poisson command). The postestimation command bivpoisson_ate supports the estimation of ATEs in our count SUR model. We provide formulas for the conditional means and the ATEs of outcomes as functions of deep parameter estimates. We show, by MC simulations, that bivpoisson_ate affords greater precision and accuracy in terms of ATEs in comparison with the ATEs estimated using poisson estimated parameters. We allow the treatment variable to be binary, and we plan to extend it to allow count-valued treatment. An example is provided to estimate the ATEs of private insurance status on the numbers of physician office visits and nonphysician health professional office visits within two-week. The user will specify: outcome y1, outcome y2, a policy variable, and a vector of control variables.

Suggested Citation

  • James Fisher & Joseph Terza & Abbie Zhang, 2023. "bivpoisson_ate: A Stata command for average treatment effects estimation with correlated count-valued outcomes," Canadian Stata Conference 2023 04, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:csug23:04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:csug23:04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.