IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/cand25/05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The effect of noncontributory pensions on inequality and poverty in Mexico: The case of the elderly pension program, 2016-2022

Author

Listed:
  • Israel Vargas Casimiro

    (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of Mexico’s pension for older adults (PAM)—formerly known as Programa 65 y Más—on inequality and poverty using microdata from the national survey of household income and expenditure (ENIGH) for the period 2016–2022. The analysis employs inequality measures: a Tobit model and a Heckman two-step selection model to assess the redistributive effects of this noncontributory pension scheme while correcting for potential selection bias. To measure inequality, I compute Lorenz curves, estimate inequality indices (Gini, Theil, among others), and apply the Atkinson index to evaluate inequality aversion. To assess the effect of PAM on poverty, I use the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) index as the dependent variable in a Tobit model, which accounts for its censored nature at 0 (for nonpoor households). Given that participation in PAM is not random, I also implement a Heckman selection model, using a probit regression in the first stage to estimate the probability of receiving the pension and incorporating the inverse Mills ratio in the second stage to correct for selection bias. Results suggest that PAM has a modest yet statistically significant effect on reducing income inequality among older adults. However, its impact on poverty is limited because the transfer amount remains insufficient to lift most beneficiaries above the poverty line. This study provides empirical evidence on the redistributive role of noncontributory pensions in Mexico.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:boc:cand25:05
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: http://repec.org/cand2025/
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:cand25:05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stataea.html .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.