IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bnr/wpaper/27.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rural Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene in Bangladesh: An Investigation of Lohagara Upazila

Author

Listed:
  • Tawhidul Islam

    (University of Chittagong)

  • Ohidul Alam

    (University of Chittagong and Tongji University)

  • Khaled Misbahuzzaman

    (University of Chittagong)

Abstract

In Lohagara Upazila and other rural areas of Chittagong, a few NGOs have been working to resolve water, sanitation and health (WaSH) problems. But it is still an issue of unresolved dearth of education and sufficient lucre. This paper is based on a survey of 72 rural families that were selected randomly in two unions of Lohagara Upazila to explore the current status and adopted measures. It appears that about one quarter of rural people are deprived of safe drinking water. Among other sources, they utilize pond water, which typically is polluted by micro-organisms and other impurities. Access to sanitary latrines is also low. Only 12.5 percent of the 24 lower class families use sanitary latrines (SLs), mostly because they cannot afford to utilize SLs. Even among the 24 middle class families, half do not use proper latrines. Both government and NGOs should come forward to support these rural people and reduce their problems, which have negative implications on the whole country.

Suggested Citation

  • Tawhidul Islam & Ohidul Alam & Khaled Misbahuzzaman, 2015. "Rural Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene in Bangladesh: An Investigation of Lohagara Upazila," Bangladesh Development Research Working Paper Series (BDRWPS) BDRWPS No. 27, Bangladesh Development Research Center (BDRC).
  • Handle: RePEc:bnr:wpaper:27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bangladeshstudies.org/files/WPS_no27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    water; sanitation; health; WaSH; rural population; Bangladesh; development;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bnr:wpaper:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bernhard Gunter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/brdccus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.