IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bls/wpaper/491.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Oregon´s Pension Legacy Costs on New Teacher Turnover and Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin E. Cahill
  • Andrew Dyke
  • Michael D. Giandrea
  • John Tapogna

Abstract

hPension legacy costs can restrict the amount of resources available for current public education and make it more difficult to attract and retain high quality teachers. Oregon provides a useful case study in pension legacy costs because many school districts in the state are now reallocating General Fund expenditures to cover sizeable past pension promises. We first describe how Oregon’s past pension promises, as compared with nearby Washington’s, affect the level of resources available to compensate new teachers. We then assess potential impacts by examining how new teacher turnover differs in districts along the Oregon-Washington border and within Oregon across school districts. We find early-career quit rates in school districts on the Oregon side of the Oregon-Washington border have exceeded those on the Washington side in recent years, and overall teacher experience on the Oregon side has fallen below that on the Washington side. Further, using district-level variation within Oregon, we find early-career quit propensities are positively associated with the percentage of General Fund revenues allocated to PERS expenditures. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that Oregon’s pension legacy costs negatively affect current teacher quality and retention.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin E. Cahill & Andrew Dyke & Michael D. Giandrea & John Tapogna, 2016. "The Impact of Oregon´s Pension Legacy Costs on New Teacher Turnover and Quality," Economic Working Papers 491, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bls.gov/osmr/research-papers/2016/pdf/ec160060.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bls:wpaper:491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jennifer Cassidy-Gilbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/blsgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.