IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bjd/wpaper/21.html

Reassessment after the Finance Act 2021: From "Reason to Believe" to jurisdictional gates

Author

Listed:
  • Laveesh Bhandari

    (Centre for Social and Economic Progress)

  • Prashant Narang

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

  • Aryan Pandey

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

Abstract

The Finance Act, 2021 fundamentally redesigned India's income-tax reassessment framework, replacing the belief-based "reason to believe" standard with an information- based model anchored in mandatory procedural preconditions. This paper examines whether these reforms have altered the discipline governing reassessment proceedings, combining doctrinal analysis with an empirical review of Income-tax Appellate Tribunal decisions from 2019 and 2025. The findings reveal a decisive shift: while reassessment was upheld in 20.6 percent of assessment years in 2019, that figure fell to 1.8 percent in 2025. More significantly, the grounds of invalidation have moved from substantive defects in the Assessing Officer's reasoning to procedural failures under Sections 149, 151, and 151A, which together account for approximately 85.6 percent of post-2021 quashing grounds. The paper argues that this procedural turn reflects a conscious legislative move toward rule-bound administration, prioritising finality and taxpayer certainty over evaluative scrutiny of administrative judgment.

Suggested Citation

  • Laveesh Bhandari & Prashant Narang & Aryan Pandey, 2026. "Reassessment after the Finance Act 2021: From "Reason to Believe" to jurisdictional gates," Working Papers 21, Trustbridge Rule of Law Foundation.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjd:wpaper:21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://trustbridge.in/RePEc/papers/20260812_Bhandarietal_tax_Reassessment.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjd:wpaper:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Latha Subramanian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/trustin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.