IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bjd/wpaper/20.html

Order writing and statutory discretion in the CCI's Section 26(2) determinations

Author

Listed:
  • Natasha Aggarwal

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

  • Amol Kulkarni

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

  • Shruti Aji Murali

    (Axiom5)

  • Bhavin Patel

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

  • Vishnu Suresh

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

Abstract

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) exercises significant discretion in its preliminary screening function under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002. These orders close proceedings at the threshold stage without directing investigation, are appealable, and determine the rights of the informant. This paper assesses the completeness of the CCI's order-writing in S. 26(2) matters and the adequacy of the statutory framework governing this discretionary power. We evaluate a random sample of 111 S. 26(2) orders issued between 2014 and 2024 using customised Good Order Writing indicators and examine appellate outcomes. This was supplemented with semi-structured interviews with practitioners and CCI officials. We find that orders are generally complete, with an average score of 59.51%, and perform well in appeal. However, we find that the statutory factors under Ss. 19(3) and 19(4) are applied inconsistently. We recommend incremental improvements in order-writing alongside the development of a dedicated framework for thresholdstage determinations under S. 26(2).

Suggested Citation

  • Natasha Aggarwal & Amol Kulkarni & Shruti Aji Murali & Bhavin Patel & Vishnu Suresh, 2026. "Order writing and statutory discretion in the CCI's Section 26(2) determinations," Working Papers 20, Trustbridge Rule of Law Foundation.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjd:wpaper:20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://trustbridge.in/RePEc/papers/2026_Aggarwaletal_wp_CCIs26(2)OrderWriting.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjd:wpaper:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Latha Subramanian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/trustin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.