IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bjd/wpaper/18.html

Evaluating India's Energy Ambitions: Evidence from Electricity Generation Project-Level Data

Author

Listed:
  • Upasa Borah

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

  • Akshay Jaitly

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

  • Renuka Sane

    (TrustBridge Rule of Law Foundation)

Abstract

This paper uses data on electricity projects from the CapEx database maintained by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) and estimates that India is likely to fall short of the optimal capacity requirement identified by the Central Electricity Authority for 2030. The shortfall stems from delays in the implementation and completion of projects. The paper finds that 30% of conventional and 39% of renewable energy projects ever announced have been completed, accounting for 15% and 9% of the total announced capacity, respectively, highlighting the difficulty in completing large-scale projects. Completion timelines are shorter for privately developed renewable and conventional projects, with the top 50 renewable energy developers outperforming others. Completion outcomes also differ by energy type, with solar and wind projects having the lowest completion timelines and the highest completion rates. These findings highlight the need for more targeted policy designs that account for the impact of these factors on project timelines, to ensure that the planned capacity translates into actual electricity supply needed to meet India's future demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Upasa Borah & Akshay Jaitly & Renuka Sane, 2026. "Evaluating India's Energy Ambitions: Evidence from Electricity Generation Project-Level Data," Working Papers 18, Trustbridge Rule of Law Foundation.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjd:wpaper:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://trustbridge.in/RePEc/papers/2026_Borahetal_evaluatingIndiasEnergyAmbitions.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjd:wpaper:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Latha Subramanian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/trustin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.