Author
Listed:
- Bank for International Settlements
Abstract
Historical experience shows that concentration of credit risk in asset portfolios has been one of the major causes of bank distress. This is true both for individual institutions as well as banking systems at large. It is therefore important to measure concentration risk in credit portfolios of banks that arises from two sources, systematic and idiosyncratic. Systematic risk represents the effect of unexpected changes in macroeconomic and financial market conditions on the performance of borrowers. Idiosyncratic risk represents the effects of risks that are peculiar to individual firms. The model framework for the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach of the Basel II Framework assumes that (a) there is only a single source of systematic risk, and (b) bank portfolios are perfectly fine-grained in the sense that as the largest individual exposures account for a smaller and smaller share of total portfolio exposure, idiosyncratic risk is diversified away at the portfolio level. To the extent that either assumption is violated, IRB capital requirements may understate the true economic capital requirement. The Concentration Risk Group of the Research Task Force of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision undertook a principally analytical project with the following objectives: (i) to provide an overview of the issues and current practice in a sample of the more advanced banks as well as highlight the main policy issues that arise in this context; (ii) to assess the extent to which "real world" deviations from the "stylised world" behind the assumptions of the IRB model can result in important deviations of economic capital from Pillar¿1 capital charges in the IRB approach; and (iii) to examine and further develop fit-for-purpose tools that can be used in the quantification of concentration risk. This paper provides an overview of the work conducted by this group and its findings. The various methodologies for the treatment of concentration risk which were analysed or refined by the group aim to reflect the current state of research in the industry and in academia.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bisbcw:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Fessler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.