IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bic/opaper/6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Case for a Latvian Version of the Obama Broadband Package

Author

Listed:
  • Alf Vanags

    (Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies (BICEPS))

Abstract

The paper investigates whether the evidence suggests that a broadband package on the lines of the Obama package in the US or the Digital Britain initiative in the UK could be an appropriate instrument in recession-hit Latvia. The idea would be to use the opportunity of the recession to create a 21st century digital infrastructure which would boost productivity and growth. Using the three pronged framework of infrastructure, readiness and use developed by Fornefeld, Delaunay and Elixmann (2008) it is shown that Latvia lags behind most of the EU in most broadband indicators. Latvia also lags in productivity with both manufacturing and services managing only 50% of the productivity level of the EU-27. A broadband development programme offers a horizontal level policy option to boost productivity, thereby avoiding the pitfall of trying to prioritize individual sectors. However, a programme is needed as well as a managing institution and most importantly funding. Perhaps the re-constituted eSecretariat now located at the Ministry of Regional Development and Local authority Affairs could serve as a managing institution. As for funding, perhaps the 4% allocated to the information society in the 2007-2013 structural funds programming period could be used or even increased. Also, Latvia is finally getting in place the legislation for public private partnership and digital development represent a potentially attractive area for such project.

Suggested Citation

  • Alf Vanags, 2009. "The Case for a Latvian Version of the Obama Broadband Package," SSE Riga/BICEPS Occasional Papers 6, Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies (BICEPS);Stockholm School of Economics in Riga (SSE Riga).
  • Handle: RePEc:bic:opaper:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://biceps.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/occasionalpaperno6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bic:opaper:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Zasova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.biceps.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.