IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Global imbalances, saving glut and investment strike

Listed author(s):
  • Moëc, G.
  • Frey, L.
Registered author(s):

    The present state of the global economy is characterised by persistent and increasingly polarised current account imbalances, in a context of historically low long-term interest rates, which stand below the equilibrium levels proxied by potential growth and trend inflation. A comprehensive analysis by Ben Bernanke1 attributes those two phenomena to one common cause: a global saving glut outside the United States. The approach below is more pessimistic than the global saving glut theory as far as the diagnosis is concerned, as the most striking feature of the present state of the global economy is not so much a saving glut as an investment strike, in spite of low long-term interest rates. This also affects the US economy where corporate investment remains subdued relative to profi ts, adding to the gradual loss in its tradable productive capacity, possibly to the benefi t of large foreign direct investment outflows. So far, such a model could be seen as sustainable. Indeed, in spite of an increasingly large deterioration in the US net international investment position, the balance of income has remained positive owing to a favourable yield spread between assets and liabilities. However, the tipping point, beyond which net investment income turns negative and therefore becomes a levy on domestic resources, seems to be near. This may lead to serious foreign debt sustainability issues and reinforces the “steep exchange rate adjustment” exit scenario with all its potentially harmful side effects. Recently, some optimistic assessments of exchange-rate-led adjustment have focused on valuation effects, through which a large amount of the US net foreign debt could be wiped out by a US dollar depreciation. We suggest that such an exchange rate shock would be likely to trigger an increase in US interest rates, which makes an exchange rate shock not as painless as it seems for the US economy. Besides, such a shock could be potentially more harmful than previous episodes of sharp US dollar adjustment from the perspective of the global economy, as the ratio of foreign-owned assets in the United States to the world GDP has tripled since the mid-1980s. However, as far as the other exit strategies are concerned, the approach below is more optimistic: since economic policies had a significant influence on the run-up to the current situation of low interest rates/global imbalances, reorienting economic policies may successfully address the issues at stake, leading to a gradual policy-driven resolution process which could be less disruptive than a market-led adjustment. The note is organised as follows: section 1 provides a brief summary of the mechanisms and implications of the “saving glut hypothesis”; section 2 discusses the accuracy of the saving glut hypothesis by looking at savings and investment behaviour in various economic regions; section 3 focuses on the saving/investment balance in the corporate sector, particularly in the United States, and the shift to the rent economy hypothesis and finally section 4 outlines various possible adjustment mechanisms of the global imbalances/low interest rates combination.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Banque de France in its series Occasional papers with number 1.

    in new window

    Length: 18 pages
    Date of creation: 2006
    Handle: RePEc:bfr:opaper:1
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Banque de France 31 Rue Croix des Petits Champs LABOLOG - 49-1404 75049 PARIS

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfr:opaper:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael brassart)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.