IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

How may risk weights differ across banks? Evidence from the corporate portfolios of French banks

Listed author(s):
  • Dietsch M.
  • Fraisse H.
  • Frappa S.

This article analyses the dispersion of risk weights for large corporate portfolios and identifies the sources of dispersion among banks in terms of the Basel risk parameters. The analysis focuses on loans granted by 5 large French banking groups to large corporates operating in France and rated by several banks under the Advanced Internal Rating Based approach (the so-called AIRB approach). The analysis differs from the existing studies since it is based on a detailed dataset of common counterparties for the five banks. Since the comparison is done on identical counterparties, the differences in RW or in risk parameters are not related to the composition of loan portfolios. This article uses a unique dataset that has been collected by the APCR in 2012 through an ad hoc survey sent to banks regarding a sample of common counterparties among the five banks. The analysis shows that banks have similar RWA rates (Risk-Weighted Assets/Exposures at Default), except one bank which is more conservative than others. Regarding Probabilities of Default (PDs), the banks exhibit broadly similar levels of average PDs. But, for Loss Given Defaults (LGDs), there is a wider dispersion. The analysis also shows that the dispersion on the RWA rates is mainly due to differences in LGDs more than the other parameters. Part of the dispersion in LGDs may be related to differences across banks in their collateral policy as well as the inclusion of collateral in LGD calculation, and in the effectiveness of the recovery process in case of default. In addition, the regulatory provision to add margins of conservatism to cover the expected range of estimation errors, may also be an explanatory factor of this dispersion, as well as the calculation of the downturn LGD. If some differences observed in LGD estimates would appear unwarranted, it could be considered to improve harmonization by focusing supervision of internal models on LGDs and by providing more rules for their computation. Therefore, in the debate around the role of the AIRB approach, this article suggests that, instead of replacing this approach, the current framework for large corporates portfolios could rather be adapted to restore confidence in internal models.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Banque de France in its series Analyse et synthèse with number 42.

in new window

Length: 21 pages
Date of creation: 2015
Handle: RePEc:bfr:analys:42
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Banque de France 31 Rue Croix des Petits Champs LABOLOG - 49-1404 75049 PARIS

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfr:analys:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael brassart)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.