IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bep/itfapp/1118.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Econometric Comparison of the Recent US and UK Housing Booms

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Bryant

    (Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania)

  • Jonathan Kohn

    (Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

The US and UK economies have experienced excessive demand for housing for over a decade, causing housing booms in both countries. Consumers have been on a spending spree, based on higher and higher real and perceived home equity values, as well as equity market increases. In the US and UK markets, "bigger is better," or "as much as one can afford," has become the mentality of home buyers, as well as "buy now to take advantage of future higher prices" at which to sell one's house. In the US, interest rates have been mostly held at historic lows since about 1990. The Federal Reserve was praised for a long time for helping the financial markets sustain their roles in the housing markets. Since the housing market crash, beginning about 2006, the Federal Reserve has been blamed for the housing crisis. In the UK, interest rates have been held at more moderate levels, but they still experienced a boom and now a slowing of their housing market. This research will compare the two housing market booms to determine what differences and factors-in-common led to these simultaneous economic situations. This paper was presented at the 18th International Conference of the International Trade and Finance Association, meeting at Universidade Nova de Lisboa, in Lisbon, Portugal, May 22, 2008.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Bryant & Jonathan Kohn, 2008. "An Econometric Comparison of the Recent US and UK Housing Booms," International Trade and Finance Association Conference Papers 1118, International Trade and Finance Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:bep:itfapp:1118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bep:itfapp:1118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itfaeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.