A Utilitarian Analysis Of Trade Liberalization
This paper argues that the currently established welfare criterion used in international trade theory results in conclusions that are not only intellectually dishonest and deceptively misleading but are not as value free as is commonly believed. This is the result of using the Hicks-Kaldor compensation principle to evaluate the welfare effects of trade. This paper argues that trade policy needs to be framed within a legitimate moral framework that moves distribution to the forefront. The welfare effects of trade should be judged by what actually happens, not by what could potentially happen in an idealized world with costless transfers. A welfare analysis of trade is thus performed after committing the three forbidden sins of "scientific economics" by assuming cardinal utility, the law of diminishing marginal utility of income, and the sin of all sins, interpersonal utility comparisons.Presented at the Allied Social Sciences Association convention in Washington, D.C., January 2003.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||05 Jan 2003|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| |
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bep:itfapp:1005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.