IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Schadensersatz bei Kartelldelikten


  • Gerhard Wagner

    (Universität Bonn)


Mit der VO 1/2003 hat die Kommission einen Paradigmenwechsel im Europäischen Wettbewerbsrecht vollzogen. Seit 1962 lag die Durchsetzung der gemeinschaftsrechtlichen Wettbewerbsregeln vor allem in den Händen der Kommission selbst. Nach der Ersten DurchführungsVO zu den heutigen Art. 81, 82 EG hatte die Kommission insbesondere ein Entscheidungsmonopol über die Ausnahmebestimmungen des Art. 81 Abs. 3 EG. Die VO 1/2003 löst dieses System des behördlichen Vollzugs des Kartellrechts ab und setzt ein Modell an seine Stelle, das vor allem auf private enforcement" setzt. Im Kern liegt darin ein Umschwenken von einer administrativ gesteuerten ex-ante Kontrolle zu einer durch die Privatinitiative angetriebenen ex-post Kontrolle aufgrund entsprechender Individualklagen.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard Wagner, "undated". "Schadensersatz bei Kartelldelikten," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2007-1-1187, Berkeley Electronic Press.
  • Handle: RePEc:bep:dewple:2007-1-1187 Note: oai:bepress:

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. W. Kip Viscusi, 2004. "The Value of Life: Estimates with Risks by Occupation and Industry," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(1), pages 29-48, January.
    2. Timothy J. Hatton, 2004. "Seeking asylum in Europe," Economic Policy, CEPR;CES;MSH, vol. 19(38), pages 5-62, April.
    3. Guido Friebel & Sergei Guriev, 2006. "Smuggling Humans: A Theory of Debt-financed Migration," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 4(6), pages 1085-1111, December.
    4. Harris, John R & Todaro, Michael P, 1970. "Migration, Unemployment & Development: A Two-Sector Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(1), pages 126-142, March.
    5. George J. Borjas, 1994. "The Economics of Immigration," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(4), pages 1667-1717, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bep:dewple:2007-1-1187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.