IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment: Surveying the Benefits of a Cultural Analysis of Law


  • Paul Berman

    (University of Connecticut)


Austin Sarat's When the State Kills explores the interrelationship between capital punishment and American culture. Utilizing scholarly approaches drawn from sociology, literary criticism, cultural studies, and political science, Sarat illuminates ways in which the official legal regime of capital punishment creates, reflects, and reinforces broader cultural attitudes about crime and punishment. Moreover, he argues that the destructive cultural consequences of state killing provide reasons for abolition over and above criminological or doctrinal arguments against the practice. Thus, When the State Kills is a powerful intervention in the ongoing death penalty debate, but it is also a case study for considering the benefits of studying law through a cultural lens. This Review Essay suggests that a cultural analysis of law is more than simply an "add-on" to doctrinally focused legal policy debates. Instead, sociolegal scholarship provides useful insights into just the sort of normative questions that are at the heart of such debates. A cultural approach demands that we attend to the important relationship between law and culture: how legal institutions construct social reality, how "law talk" gets dispersed throughout society, how individuals deploy and resist legal norms, and how law symbolically reflects and reinforces deep cultural attitudes, fears, or beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Berman, "undated". "The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment: Surveying the Benefits of a Cultural Analysis of Law," University of Connecticut School of Law Working Papers uconn_ucwps-1011, University of Connecticut School of Law.
  • Handle: RePEc:bep:conlaw:uconn_ucwps-1011

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bep:conlaw:uconn_ucwps-1011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.