IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdp/dpaper/0109.html

Keeping Climate Populism in Check: A New Perspective on Public Acceptability of Net-Zero Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Till Armbruster
  • Elina Dilger
  • Théo Konc
  • Linus Mattauch

Abstract

How damages, economic impacts and policy responses jointly shape the politics of climate change remains poorly understood. In this article, we synthesise the recent wealth of empirical contributions on political outcomes from damages and mitigation policy with a focus on populism. We present a framework connecting climate policies and climate-induced extreme weather events to populist demand, addressing how the rise of populism shapes feasibility of climate policies. The framework comprises income effects, changes in the physical and social environment, behavioural restrictions and symbolic motives induced by climate damages and mitigation measures. We argue that how these elements translate into populist demand depends on both policy design – such as compensation and policy sequencing – and institutional context – such as media framing, procedural inclusion, crisis management and political competition. Climate policies and broader communication on net-zero goals should be designed to prevent climate damages and policy from becoming drivers of populism.

Suggested Citation

  • Till Armbruster & Elina Dilger & Théo Konc & Linus Mattauch, 2026. "Keeping Climate Populism in Check: A New Perspective on Public Acceptability of Net-Zero Policies," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0109, Berlin School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdp:dpaper:0109
    DOI: 10.48462/opus4-6393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-hsog/files/6393/BSoE_DP_0109.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.48462/opus4-6393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdp:dpaper:0109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Reiter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdpemde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.