IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_980_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The functioning of the tax justice system: microdata evidence from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Cannella

    (Bank of Italy)

  • Maria Enza Castiglia

    (Bank of Italy)

  • Giacomo Marcolin

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

This study provides a concise overview of the legal framework governing tax litigation in Italy and documents some stylized facts concerning its functioning, using data on corporate tax disputes. The analyses show that the number of disputes has declined, relative to the early 2010s, partly due to the deflationary effect of the mandatory tax mediation introduced in 2011. On the other hand, the average duration of proceedings and the rate of reversal of decisions between first and second instance have remained broadly stable. By linking litigation data to the financial statements of the population of joint-stock companies, the study identifies factors associated with the incidence of disputes. The analysis reveals a higher concentration of litigation in the manufacturing and trade sectors, as well as in the South. Involvement in tax litigation is associated with a deterioration in corporate performance and with higher exit rates following disputes with negative outcomes, particularly for smaller and more highly indebted firms. The data show a reduction in activity for both successful and unsuccessful firms, suggesting that the uncertainty and costs associated with tax litigation play a significant as well as negative role.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Cannella & Maria Enza Castiglia & Giacomo Marcolin, 2025. "The functioning of the tax justice system: microdata evidence from Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 980, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_980_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2025-0980/QEF_980_25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_980_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.