IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_546_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Irpef: (Un)Fairness and (in)efficiency. A structural analysis based on the BIMic microsimulation model

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Curci

    (Banca d'Italia)

  • Pietro Rizza

    (Banca d'Italia)

  • Marzia Romanelli

    (Banca d’Italia)

  • Marco Savegnago

    (Banca d’Italia)

Abstract

We discuss the structural features of the Italian personal income tax (Irpef) and its effects on income redistribution and labour supply incentives. The analysis is carried out using Banca d’Italia’s static microsimulation model BIMic. We find that Irpef plays a decisive role in making the Italian tax system progressive; almost all of the redistribution that comes from Irpef is due in equal measure to the structure of income brackets and to deductions, while the definition of the tax base has an ambiguous effect overall on Irpef’s redistributive effects. As regards the efficiency and the degree of distortion of economic agents’ choices, we note the presence of high values of effective marginal tax rates rates (EMTRs) also at relatively low levels of income; moreover, the variability of EMTRs is also large within the same income class. Finally, we discuss two counterfactual hypotheses that modify the ‘Irpef bonus’ with respect to the 2019 legislation. The difference between the two hypotheses concerns the extent of the increase and, above all, the speed at which the bonus phases out as income increases. Both alternatives result in a reduction of both inequality and EMTRs compared with the baseline scenario. Moreover, the traditional equity-efficiency trade-off is confirmed, since the reduction in EMTRs is more pronounced in the scenario where that of inequality is milder, and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Curci & Pietro Rizza & Marzia Romanelli & Marco Savegnago, 2020. "Irpef: (Un)Fairness and (in)efficiency. A structural analysis based on the BIMic microsimulation model," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 546, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_546_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2020-0546/QEF_546_20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martino Tasso, 2020. "Do details matter? An analysis of Italian personal income tax," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1301, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Irpef; redistribution; efficiency; microsimulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H22 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Incidence
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_546_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.