IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdc/ppaper/38.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Navigating SEP Licensing: A Comparison of International Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Saloni Dhadwal

    (Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER))

  • Aman Sinha

Abstract

The ecosystem of Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) represents a delicate balance of legal precedent, economic imperatives, and geoeconomic interests. This policy brief explores the evolving global landscape of SEPs by analysing judicial trends and policy developments across several jurisdictions. While the EU, UK, and US have predominantly adopted a case-by-case adjudicative approach, China’s regulatory stance, particularly its use of anti-suit injunctions, has sparked concerns, leading to calls for consultations at global forums such as the WTO. Meanwhile, countries like Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and New Zealand have worked toward balanced regulatory frameworks, whereas Brazil and Colombia are still navigating emerging SEP disputes within their developing judicial systems. In this dynamic environment, India, with its expanding digital economy and aspirations to become a global manufacturing hub, faces the challenge of formulating an SEP framework suited to its industrial and legal landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Saloni Dhadwal & Aman Sinha, 2025. "Navigating SEP Licensing: A Comparison of International Approaches," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Policy Paper 38, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdc:ppaper:38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://icrier.org/pdf/pb-38_Navigating_SEP_Licensing.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdc:ppaper:38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chhaya Singh (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.icrier.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.