IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/fr13696.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Labour transitions that lead to platform work: Towards increased formality? Evidence from Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia POGGI
  • Sonia FILIPETTO
  • Ariela MICHA
  • Francisca PEREYRA
  • Martín TROMBETTA

Abstract

The recent growth of the platform economy as a tool for labour exchanges has brought about concerns on the overall quality of jobs created. As labour platforms leave a digital trace, this paper assesses whether platforms can help to increase registered labour in contexts of extended informality as the one for Argentina, asking what does formalization via registration - if any - actually imply for workers and how do they perceive it. The article inspects three on-demand occupations in the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area: private passengers’ transportation (Uber), domestic work (Zolvers) and home repair services (Home Solution). The main results show that platforms “formalization effect” is dependent on several factors: a platform’s business model, or the company’s interest and need to promote or encourage such process; the pre-existing occupational dynamics in terms of formalization; and general labour market conditions. In the context of an Argentine labour market harmed by a prolongued recession, most transitions to formality via the platform occur to previously unemployed workers who join them.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia POGGI & Sonia FILIPETTO & Ariela MICHA & Francisca PEREYRA & Martín TROMBETTA, 2022. "Labour transitions that lead to platform work: Towards increased formality? Evidence from Argentina," Working Paper faa6161e-8fc7-4564-9732-0, Agence française de développement.
  • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:fr13696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2022-03-07-39-12/Labour-transitions-that-lead-to-platform-work-Argentina.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Argentine;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:fr13696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.