IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/en14492.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How does fertility affect female employment? Evidence from Albania

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia POGGI
  • Andrea CINQUE
  • Juna MILUKA
  • Claire GUIRAUD

Abstract

This article inspects the relationship between fertility and employment, providing an explanatory mixed-methods analysis to gauge their nexus for rural and urban Albania over the 2000s. Instrumenting reproductive decision with having two first-born daughters in a 2SLS model of employment, we find that having an additional child influences negatively employment probability for rural mothers, but it does not influence employment decision in urban areas. Rural women are particularly dependent on their fertility decision if they have low levels of education. This effect is not particularly relevant to specific types of rural employment, but it is reinforced by demographic traits of the household, such as if there are seniors in the household or if the partner is working. The analysis highlights that there is a different and relatively worse labour market trajectory experienced by rural women than their urban counterparts. The article then examines qualitatively how structural and contextual settings influence women in their decisions. It inspects the experience of rural women from three distinct rural municipalities, exploring the differential roles that policy could play to favour their insertion.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia POGGI & Andrea CINQUE & Juna MILUKA & Claire GUIRAUD, 2022. "How does fertility affect female employment? Evidence from Albania," Working Paper 62393300-bc03-4fd2-b629-5, Agence française de développement.
  • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en14492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2022-09-11-27-40/How%20does%20fertility%20affect%20female%20employment.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Autres pays;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en14492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.