IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/auu/hpaper/137.html

The economic, political and social aftermath of the 1933 Long Beach Earthquake

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Elliott Gordon

Abstract

On March 10, 1933 a moderate earthquake (6.2 on the Richter scale) hit the city of Long Beach, California. Although not especially strong seismically, the quake did extensive damage to property in Long Beach and surrounding communities, and killed 120 people. The main reason why the Long Beach earthquake was so catastrophic was unreinforced masonry building construction. The quake itself is an interesting story, but the aftermath is even more interesting. This single event inspired passage of the Field Act, a template by which later seismic building regulations were developed; it was the first time that accelerographs were used to measure ground motion, thus playing a key role in the continuing development of earthquake science; and the subsequent reconstruction of the City caused the then stagnant economy to take off rather dramatically, serving as a sort of example of what might be called “Disaster Keynesianism.†The Long Beach earthquake is thus an interesting example of the human role in “natural disasters.â€

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Elliott Gordon, 2026. "The economic, political and social aftermath of the 1933 Long Beach Earthquake," CEH Discussion Papers 03, Centre for Economic History, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
  • Handle: RePEc:auu:hpaper:137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cbe.anu.edu.au/researchpapers/CEH/WP202603.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:auu:hpaper:137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/chanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.