IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/auk/ecosoc/2015_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

«Is Mexico the Limiting Case? Social Mobility in the New Gilded Age»

Author

Listed:
  • Juan E. Huerta Wong
  • Esra Burak
  • David B. Grusky

    (Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to ask whether the «family resemblance» hypothesis within the sociological literature remains plausible in light of evidence from a single case, Mexico, that is seemingly well positioned to call it into question. In carrying out our analysis, the U.S. will serve as the comparison case against which Mexican mobility may be calibrated, an approach that rests on the well-known result that, at least as regards class mobility, the U.S. regime is aukte average and unexceptional. Under our simplest meso-class model, the offspring of Mexican managers are 15.6 times more likely to be immobile than mobile, whereas the offspring of U.S. managers are only 2.3 times more likely to be immobile. We likewise find that, when our full multiplicative model is estimated, Mexico proves to be aukte rigid at the top of the class structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan E. Huerta Wong & Esra Burak & David B. Grusky, 2015. "«Is Mexico the Limiting Case? Social Mobility in the New Gilded Age»," Papers 2015_17, Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesias.
  • Handle: RePEc:auk:ecosoc:2015_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ceey.org.mx/is-mexico-the-limiting-case-social-mobility-in-the-new-gilded-age/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:auk:ecosoc:2015_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEEY Editorial (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceeymmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.