IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aue/wpaper/2620.html

Blockchain-enabled Local Energy Markets as Climate Resilience Infrastructure: A Welfare-Based Framework for Distributed Flexibility, Storage and Community Energy Trading

Author

Listed:
  • Phoebe Koundouri

    (Dept. of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business)

  • Stathis Devves

Abstract

Climate change, increasing electrification, energy-price volatility, and growing dependence on variable renewable resources are increasing the exposure of local and regional energy systems to economic and operational disruptions. Strengthening climate resilience therefore requires systemic approaches capable of integrating distributed flexibility, behavioural adaptation, local market coordination, and digital governance. This study develops an integrated behavioural-economic-technical framework for evaluating residential prosumers participating in blockchain-enabled local electricity markets under dynamic pricing. The model operates over an annual 8,760-hour horizon and combines endogenous utility-based demand response, photovoltaic generation, battery storage, grid interaction, peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading, battery degradation, and multidimensional welfare assessment. Three progressively more intelligent battery dispatch strategies-a fixed rule-based strategy, an adaptive forecast-based strategy, and a 24-hour rolling-horizon optimisation strategy-are evaluated for four storage capacities of 10, 15, 20, and 30 kWh under identical assumptions and performance indicators. Results show that dispatch intelligence is generally more influential than battery size alone in determining grid dependence, renewable self-consumption, price responsiveness, and welfare allocation. Strategy A exhibits strong capacity saturation, Strategy B produces the strongest capacity-dependent response and buyer-oriented redistribution of P2P benefits, while Strategy C provides a more balanced compromise between prosumer welfare, market participation, and storage utilisation. Fourier decomposition further identifies systematic intraday periodicity in elasticity, P2P price reductions, and participant utilities, revealing temporal market dynamics that are not captured by annual indicators alone. A utility-based clearing-price benchmark additionally quantifies the distribution of welfare between buyers and selling prosumers, while a hierarchical welfare decomposition separates behavioural utility, conventional grid-related surplus, and decentralised P2P welfare. Overall, the findings demonstrate that distributed storage, intelligent dispatch, and blockchain-enabled local trading can reduce exposure to wholesale-market volatility, increase local renewable utilisation and energy autonomy, and strengthen the adaptive capacity of energy communities. The framework therefore interprets distributed flexibility not merely as an optimisation resource, but as a form of local climate-resilience infrastructure supporting more adaptive, decentralised, and inclusive energy transitions

Suggested Citation

  • Phoebe Koundouri & Stathis Devves, 2026. "Blockchain-enabled Local Energy Markets as Climate Resilience Infrastructure: A Welfare-Based Framework for Distributed Flexibility, Storage and Community Energy Trading," DEOS Working Papers 2620, Athens University of Economics and Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/2620.BLOCKCHAIN.ENABLED.LOCAL.ENERGY.MARKETS.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yael Parag & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2016. "Electricity market design for the prosumer era," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(4), pages 1-6, April.
    2. Antonio J. Conejo & Miguel Carrión & Juan M. Morales, 2010. "Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4419-7421-1, June.
    3. Zheng Wang, & Luther, Mark & Horan, Peter & Matthews, Jane & Liu, Chunlu, 2025. "Technical and economic analyses of grid-connected residential PV considering batteries and peer-to-peer energy sharing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    4. Nadarajah, Selvaprabu & Secomandi, Nicola, 2023. "A review of the operations literature on real options in energy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 469-487.
    5. Phoebe Koundouri & Angelos Alamanos & Giannis Arampatzidis & Stathis Devves & Konstantinos Dellis & Christopher Deranian, 2025. "Assessing national climate-neutrality plans through a modelling nexus lens: the case of Greece," DEOS Working Papers 2544, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savelli, Iacopo & Morstyn, Thomas, 2021. "Electricity prices and tariffs to keep everyone happy: A framework for fixed and nodal prices coexistence in distribution grids with optimal tariffs for investment cost recovery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Alexandros-Georgios Chronis & Foivos Palaiogiannis & Iasonas Kouveliotis-Lysikatos & Panos Kotsampopoulos & Nikos Hatziargyriou, 2021. "Photovoltaics Enabling Sustainable Energy Communities: Technological Drivers and Emerging Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Tsaousoglou, Georgios & Giraldo, Juan S. & Paterakis, Nikolaos G., 2022. "Market Mechanisms for Local Electricity Markets: A review of models, solution concepts and algorithmic techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Tao Chen & Qais Alsafasfeh & Hajir Pourbabak & Wencong Su, 2017. "The Next-Generation U.S. Retail Electricity Market with Customers and Prosumers—A Bibliographical Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Yasemin Merzifonluoglu & Eray Uzgoren, 2018. "Photovoltaic power plant design considering multiple uncertainties and risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(1), pages 153-184, March.
    6. Attia, Ahmed M. & Darghouth, Mohamed N. & Ghaithan, Ahmed M. & Mohammed, Awsan & Abdel-Aal, Mohammad A.M. & Al Hanbali, Ahmad & Alsawafy, Omar G., 2025. "Design optimization of standalone photovoltaic systems for enhanced energy density," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    7. Wang, Dongxue & Fan, Ruguo & Yang, Peiwen & Du, Kang & Xu, Xiaoxia & Chen, Rongkai, 2024. "Research on floating real-time pricing strategy for microgrid operator in local energy market considering shared energy storage leasing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 368(C).
    8. Pandžić, Hrvoje & Kuzle, Igor & Capuder, Tomislav, 2013. "Virtual power plant mid-term dispatch optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 134-141.
    9. Wang, Dongxiao & Qiu, Jing & Reedman, Luke & Meng, Ke & Lai, Loi Lei, 2018. "Two-stage energy management for networked microgrids with high renewable penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 39-48.
    10. Sadeghian, Omid & Mohammadpour Shotorbani, Amin & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Sadiq, Rehan & Hewage, Kasun, 2021. "Risk-averse maintenance scheduling of generation units in combined heat and power systems with demand response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Zhou, Yuekuan & Lund, Peter D., 2023. "Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities ─ trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 177-193.
    13. Mukherjee, Monish & Hardy, Trevor & Fuller, Jason C. & Bose, Anjan, 2022. "Implementing multi-settlement decentralized electricity market design for transactive communities with imperfect communication," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    14. Mohagheghi, Erfan & Gabash, Aouss & Alramlawi, Mansour & Li, Pu, 2018. "Real-time optimal power flow with reactive power dispatch of wind stations using a reconciliation algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 509-523.
    15. Park, Sung-Won & Zhang, Zhong & Li, Furong & Son, Sung-Yong, 2021. "Peer-to-peer trading-based efficient flexibility securing mechanism to support distribution system stability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    16. Azim, M. Imran & Tushar, Wayes & Saha, Tapan K., 2021. "Cooperative negawatt P2P energy trading for low-voltage distribution networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    17. Grover-Silva, Etta & Heleno, Miguel & Mashayekh, Salman & Cardoso, Gonçalo & Girard, Robin & Kariniotakis, George, 2018. "A stochastic optimal power flow for scheduling flexible resources in microgrids operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 201-208.
    18. Nitsch, Felix & Deissenroth-Uhrig, Marc & Schimeczek, Christoph & Bertsch, Valentin, 2021. "Economic evaluation of battery storage systems bidding on day-ahead and automatic frequency restoration reserves markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    19. Wilkinson, Sam & Maticka, Martin J. & Liu, Yue & John, Michele, 2021. "The duck curve in a drying pond: The impact of rooftop PV on the Western Australian electricity market transition," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Monyei, Chukwuka G. & Akpeji, Kingsley O. & Oladeji, Olamide & Babatunde, Olubayo M. & Aholu, Okechukwu C. & Adegoke, Damilola & Imafidon, Justus O., 2022. "Regional cooperation for mitigating energy poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: A context-based approach through the tripartite lenses of access, sufficiency, and mobility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:2620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ekaterini Glynou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diauegr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.