IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aue/wpaper/1304.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Methodology for Integrated Socio-Economic Assessment of Offshore Platforms: Towards Facilitation of the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Anastasiou
  • Anastasios Xepapadeas
  • Vassilios Babalos
  • Marva Stithou

    (University of Stirling, UK)

  • Osiel Davila

    (AUEB-RC)

  • Phoebe Koundouri
  • Antonios Antypas

    (Department of Banking and Financial Management, University of Piraeus)

  • Nikolaos Kourogenis

    (Department of Banking and Financial Management, University of Piraeus.)

  • Aris Mousoulides
  • Marianna Mousoulidou
  • Nick Ahrensberg
  • Barbara Zanuttigh
  • Fabio Zagonari
  • Manfred A. Lange
  • Carlos Jimenez
  • Elena Charalambous
  • Lars Rosen
  • Andreas Lindhe
  • Jenny Norrman
  • Tommy Norberg
  • Tore Soderqvist
  • Aksel Pedersen
  • Dimitris Troianos
  • Athanasios Frentzos
  • Yukiko Krontira
  • Inigo Losada
  • Pedro Diaz-Simal
  • Raul Guanche
  • Mark de Bel
  • Wei He
  • Sedat Kabdasli
  • Nilay Elginoz
  • Elif Oguz
  • Taylan Bagci
  • Bilge Bas
  • Matteo Cantu�
  • Matteo Masotti
  • Roberto Suffredini
  • Marian Stuiver

Abstract

In this paper a Methodology for Integrated Socio-Economic Assessment (MISEA) of the viability and sustainability of different designs of Multi-Use Offshore Platforms (MUOPs) is presented. MUOPs are designed for multi-use of ocean space for energy extraction (wind power production and wave energy), aquaculture and transport maritime services. The developed methodology allows identification, valuation and assessment of: the potential range of impacts of a number of feasible designs of MUOP investments, and the likely responses of those impacted by the investment project. This methodology provides decision-makers with a valuable decision tool to assess whether a MUOP project increases the overall social welfare and hence should be undertaken, under alternative specifications regarding its design, the discount rate and the stream of net benefits, if a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is to be followed or sensitivity analysis of selected criteria in a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework. Such a methodology is also crucial for facilitating of the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD adopted in June 2008) that aims to achieve good environmental status of the EU's marine waters by 2020 and to protect the resource base upon which marine-related economic and social activities depend. According to the MSFD each member state must draw up a program of cost-effective measures, while prior to any new measure an impact assessment which contains a detailed cost-benefit analysis of the proposed measures is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Anastasiou & Anastasios Xepapadeas & Vassilios Babalos & Marva Stithou & Osiel Davila & Phoebe Koundouri & Antonios Antypas & Nikolaos Kourogenis & Aris Mousoulides & Marianna Mousoulidou & Ni, 2013. "Methodology for Integrated Socio-Economic Assessment of Offshore Platforms: Towards Facilitation of the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive," DEOS Working Papers 1304, Athens University of Economics and Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:1304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/Koundourietal(2012).pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multi-Use Offshore Platforms; Integrated Socio-Economic Assessment; Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Program of Measures; Cost-Benefit Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:1304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ekaterini Glynou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diauegr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.